4
63.8 %
94.9 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 63.8%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 21.7 | 96.6% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.2 | NA | NA | 0.2 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 3.9 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 13.6 | 11.6% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, other | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.5 | NA | 0.6 | NA | NA | 3.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.2 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 14 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 72 | 94.4% | 1 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 12 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 44 | 13.6% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | 5 | 1 | 4 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 11 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 24.4% |
| 2015 | 2.8 | 6.4 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 37.3% |
| 2016 | 3.4 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 15.5% |
| 2017 | 1.8 | 6.7 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 34.0% |
| 2018 | 4.2 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 19.7% |
| Total | 15.1 | 39.1 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 24.6% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 8.4 | 1.30 | 1.1 | 12.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 7.4 | 1.41 | 0.9 | 12.1% |
| 2016-2018 | 8.2 | 1.30 | 1.0 | 11.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 8.9 | 0.86 | 0.8 | 8.9% |
| Total | 17.3 | 1.07 | 1.9 | 10.8% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 3 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 42.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 8.4 | 1.16 | 2.7 | 31.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 7.4 | 1.13 | 2.0 | 26.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 8.2 | 1.14 | 1.7 | 21.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 8.9 | 1.11 | 0.7 | 8.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 10.8 | 1.15 | 1.8 | 17.1% |
| Total | 20.9 | 1.15 | 4.5 | 21.5% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 35 | 0 | 0.0% | 23 | 65.7% |
| 2015-2017 | 24 | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 45.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 27 | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 48.1% |
| 2017-2019 | 24 | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 41.7% |
| 2018-2020 | 30 | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 46.7% |
| Total | 68 | 0 | 0.0% | 37 | 54.4% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 |
| Germany | 17 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
| France | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| Russian Federation | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| Finland | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| United States | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Japan | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Italy | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Czech Republic | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Spain | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Hungary | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Slovenia | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety Institute | Institute | France | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Karlsruhe Institute of Technology | University | Germany | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission (CEA) | Other Public | France | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Lappeenranta University of Technology | University | Finland | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Xi’an Jiaotong University | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | University | United States | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Russian Academy of Sciences | Other Public | Russian Federation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology | Other health services | Japan | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| University of Stuttgart | University | Germany | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University | University | Russian Federation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| AREVA GmbH | Company | Germany | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| A.P. Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology (NITI) | Institute | Russian Federation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| KOREA ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE | Institute | Korea, Republic of | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Secretariat Nucl Regulat Author S NRA R | NA | Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| VTT Technical Research Centre | Institute | Finland | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Shandong University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Paul Scherrer Institute | Institute | Switzerland | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| UJV Rez, as | Company | Czech Republic | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences | Institute | Russian Federation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU) | Institute | Germany | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| China University of Petroleum | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Society for Plant and Reactor Safety (GRS) gGmbH | Other Public | Germany | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Belgian nuclear research centre (CEN SCK) | Institute | Belgium | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| China Guangdong Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. | Company | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| CPI Power Engn Co LTD | NA | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation | Other Public | Russian Federation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Saint Petersburg State University | University | Russian Federation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation | Company | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| TOSHIBA | Company | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | Other Public | United States | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| European Commission | Other Public | Netherlands | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| European Commission | Other Public | Germany | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Italian National agency for new technologies (ENEA) | Other Public | Italy | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| AREVA NP SAS | Company | Germany | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Institute of Nuclear Energy and Energy Systems (IKE) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| RSE SpA - Research on Energy System | Institute | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Hungarian Academy of Sciences | Other | Hungary | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Jozef Stefan Institute | Institute | Slovenia | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Technical University, Sofia | University | Bulgaria | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Canadian Nucl Safety Commiss | NA | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Ctr Invest Energet MediaAmbientales & Tecnol | NA | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Nucl Energy Agcy | NA | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG) | Institute | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Pisa | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Tokyo | University | Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Oak Ridge National Laboratory | Other Public | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Pennsylvania State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Michigan | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) | University | Russian Federation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Technical University of Munich | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Institute of Inorganic Chemistry | Institute | Czech Republic | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Thermodata | Other Public | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| AREVA NP SAS | Company | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Bulgarian Academy of Sciences | Institute | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| CIEMAT | Institute | Spain | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| EDF Energy plc | Company | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Rössel & Brandt GmbH | Company | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 40.0% |
| 2015 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 22.2% |
| 2020 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20.0% |
| Total | 78 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 60 | 23.1% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 5.5 | 30.1 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 24.9% |
| 2015 | 6.5 | 34.8 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 40.5% |
| 2016 | 4.4 | 25.5 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 26.6% |
| 2017 | 2.4 | 19.8 | 8.1 | 1.0 | 42.1% |
| 2018 | 4.3 | 19.1 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 9.5% |
| 2019 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 60.9% |
| 2020 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 53.1% |
| Total | 33.7 | 137.5 | 4.1 | 12.8 | 37.9% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 14.8 | 0.64 | 1.0 | 6.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 11.9 | 0.72 | 1.0 | 8.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 10.2 | 0.75 | 0.4 | 4.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 11.6 | 0.59 | 0.3 | 2.5% |
| Total | 26.4 | 0.62 | 1.3 | 4.8% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 36 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 9.1 | 1.42 | 7.1 | 78.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 8.2 | 1.40 | 6.6 | 81.4% |
| 2016-2018 | 8.6 | 1.53 | 7.6 | 88.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 9.3 | 1.49 | 7.9 | 84.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 11.0 | 1.52 | 9.1 | 82.4% |
| Total | 22.2 | 1.48 | 18.0 | 81.1% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 62 | 44 | 71.0% | 36 | 58.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 44 | 32 | 72.7% | 22 | 50.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 36 | 26 | 72.2% | 19 | 52.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 37 | 24 | 64.9% | 20 | 54.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 43 | 28 | 65.1% | 24 | 55.8% |
| Total | 110 | 76 | 69.1% | 62 | 56.4% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 36 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 91.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
